Friday, June 4, 2010

Rope Trick


To the ego, the present moment is, at best, only useful as a means to an end.  It gets you from some future moment that is considered more important, even though the future never comes except as the present moment and is therefore never more than a thought in your head.  In other words, you are never fully here because you are always busy trying to get elsewhere.[i]  –Eckhart Tolle, A New Earth:  Awakening to Your Life’s Purpose

That which is above is like to that which is below, and that which is below is like to that which is above.  –The Emerald Tablet of Hermes

(Note: if you’ve been following this blog, you may have noticed that the time between posts has been increasing.  This is because once I had plucked all the low-hanging fruit about my cute children, bad mental habits and shifting doctrinal landscape, I was left with nothing to do but actually confront the root causes of my profound screwed-up-titude—and that confrontation is something my inner Senate continually threatens to filibuster. I mean, how many times can a relatively reasonable person check his email, Facebook and the Huffington Post?  Enough to fill up whole afternoons with not-writing, apparently.  A large part of my brain wants to be anywhere but here, doing anything but this.) 

“I’m probably going to bail early,” I told the grad student who requested a ride to the potluck-and-bluegrass-jam that wrapped up the first day of the Mid-Atlantic Conference of the Society for Ethnomusicology.  I had left Philly at dawn to drive to Charlottesville, daylight savings time began that night, and I was giving my paper the next day; everything argued for a good night’s sleep. 

Need I say that’s not what happened? 

Most of the non-jamming guests had left by the time we packed up our instruments and said our goodbyes.  As I looked around for the people I’d come with, I heard the sound of an axatse (a West African instrument comprising a gourd enclosed in a network of beads) and turned to see our hostess demonstrating a complex 12-beat rhythm to a colleague by bouncing the gourd between her hand and thigh. I stifled an impulse to go over and learn the rhythm, too—I have to go to bed! I told myself--then turned sheepishly to the waiting grad student.  “I guess that bailing early plan didn’t work out,” I admitted.

En route to the hotel, I told my passengers that “I used to smoke weed when I was younger, until I discovered that the world is fascinating already.”  And it is.  When I let the dogs out before bedtime and hear the wind soughing in the neighbor’s gigantic sycamore tree, its looming form blotting out the stars over our back yard, it is fascinating; when we open up the Styrofoam cooler in the shed and find that the children have filled it with grass while playing Underground Railroad (apparently the grass represented provisions of some kind) it is fascinating; when I am bawling out my five-year-old, and my six-year-old tells her, “Daddy’s not saying you’re not a good person, Sophie,” it is altogether fascinating. Bluegrass and the axatse are fascinating.  Who needs weed? 

Of course, we all need fascination—what Paul Gauguin called “a sense of the beyond, of a heart that beats.”  One evening while our first daughter Clare was still a baby, my wife and I were having dinner at a friend’s house when Clare began to get fussy. Our hostess picked her up and took her across the room to look at a candle.  “Let’s get fascinated!”  she said.  Our baby stared, rapt and slack-jawed, at the flickering flame, and I saw for the hundredth time how numinous and mesmerizing the world was in her infant eyes.  Not presuming to have all the answers about anything she saw, or to be able to control things by naming them, she was happy to let the world be its fascinating self--almost as though she could detect “the dearest freshness deep down things”[ii] with some special sixth baby-sense. “We see the world with the five senses,” said Swami Vivekananda, “but if we had another sense, we would see in it something more.”[iii] 

Longing for this “something more” is, I believe, the reason people smoke weed; having lost the baby-sense, people turn to THC to open their minds to the bottomless fascination of the world.  Because we no longer have eyes to see and ears to hear, we have lost touch with the infinite, absolute, eternal life that animates our narrow, relative and temporary lives. "I tell you the truth,” Jesus said, “unless you change and become like little children, you will never enter the kingdom of heaven.”[iv]  But changing is hard, and chemicals can seem to bypass the need for it.  It’s not for nothing that the body’s neurotransmitter that the cannabinoids in marijuana mimic is called “anandamide”; ananda is Sanskrit for “bliss.”[v]  We will, apparently, take our bliss any way we can get it. 

People do drugs because they want, as Marianne Williamson put it, “a different experience of what is.”  And it seems to work because “what is” is slippery and unstable; so much so, in fact, that many things can alter your roadmap of reality.  My first year or so of temp work was strictly blue-collar, from assembly line and warehouse work to flagging traffic to shoveling ore in a government mineral depot.  During a run of success as a composer, when my temp agency supervisors noticed my name appearing in the local papers and heard me interviewed on public radio a few times, I started getting “cleaner” jobs, like setting up insecticide displays in supermarkets—jobs for which I wore a tie.  I was astonished at how differently people treated me--even out in the country where nearly all the men wore work boots and lined flannel shirts--when I wore a white shirt and a tie.  I was the same person who had worn the reflective orange vest the week before, but when the complexion of the maya, or illusion, around you changes, people perceive and respond to you differently. If a drug could make that kind of difference in our experience of the world, you couldn’t keep it on the shelves.

(Sometimes a little maya bait-and-switch can be fun.  During a period when I was getting a lot of commissions and performances, expensively-dressed people would approach me at post-concert receptions and ask me where I taught.  “Actually, I work at K & W Tire,” I’d tell them.  The visible discomfort in their faces and bodies before they extricated themselves from my company and went to freshen their drinks:  priceless.)

So what happens when our experience of our lives is wildly out of tune with any rational assessment of our circumstances?  During a rehearsal at another musician’s house, my hostess handed me a drink.  Distracted with a piece of sheet music, I took the glass, seeing peripherally the clear liquid inside and assuming that it was water.  I took a drink and was appalled by the nastiness of the fluid in my mouth—which, as it turns out, was Sprite.  Which I like.  But because I had been expecting water, and my mind was configured for it, I experienced the Sprite as unpleasant.

My life is like that.  I have a fantastic life:  two wonderful, intelligent, thoughtful, exuberant children, a loving wife who puts up with me and keeps me honest and earns enough to allow me to stay home, keep house and garden running, compose and perform music and spend hours on a self-indulgent blog.  But because it isn’t what I was expecting, I often experience my life as confining, unfulfilling.  I expected it to be full of height and depth and gravitas, and have found it full of dog fur and goutweed.  I looked forward to being intellectually and aesthetically stimulated on a daily basis.  (What I thought would happen about the dog fur and goutweed I don’t know.)  I thought I would feel more important.

There are no Desert Fathers around when you need one to adjust your attitude.  I am haunted by the story of the young monk who went to Abba Moses for advice on spiritual advancement. “Go and sit in your cell,” the Abba told him, “and your cell will teach you everything.”  Your life as it is, here and now, is gravid with everything you need to know--but it seldom appears that way.  And yet, if we had eyes to see—if we could get our thoughts out of the way of our perceptions, if we could stop labeling everything with a “yes, I know all about that”--who knows what we could detect in the seemingly undifferentiated landscape of our lives?  If we had no mental category for “green,” the woods would be a riot of color.

I have never owned a television in my adult life, but when I was a child I watched a lot of TV.  And of course, life on TV always seems more interesting and fulfilling than life elsewhere, as it’s meant to. My own life involved a lot of being bullied on the schoolbus and playground, so TV had a lot of allure for me.  Moreover, my budding religious sensibility was stewed in a sort of vindicationalism: I got picked on at school, but I was going to reign with the saints in the Kingdom.  So there were some pretty powerful incentives to regard day-to-day life as unreal--a preparation for some more fulfilling, fascinating “real life” that was going to happen at some time in the future.

The worst of this is that so much good passes us by while we are on the lookout for something better. I read somewhere that most of us meet some 1400 people during our lives with whom we could be compatible life partners.  So why aren’t we all happily married?  Because we see other people through the filter of the ridiculous ideas in our heads.

And not just people.  Early on in my folksinging days, a number of friends urged me to “go on the circuit” as a folk musician.  I was reasonably good at it, and I loved doing it.  But something had happened in my brain that made me regard ballads, pub songs and fiddle tunes as mere avocation, and somehow frivolous; my real work, I always told myself, was in the musical world in which I was being trained in graduate school.  It didn’t matter that playing my concertina and inviting my listeners to sing along made me happy; I was a composer—which is to say, a “serious” musician.  I cringe with shame to recall this—some of the most phenomenal musicians I have known have worked in traditional music--but that is honestly how I thought about it.  I could watch a group of novice dancers and extend a tune until they had completed a figure before moving to the next part of the tune, I could invent lyrics on the spot, I could improvise a musical accompaniment to a Commedia dell’ Arte performance, I had several hundred songs in my head ready to go at any time—but those skills all involved music in the service of something else, while serious music existed purely as a sonic object to be politely contemplated in a concert or recital hall.  So I spent years of my life, great pots of money, untold hours of unflagging industry and enough emotional energy to power a small city trying to fit into that world and make that music.  Why didn’t I see earlier that I was barking up the wrong tree?

Half my lifetime ago I had an experience that, had I known at the time how to interpret it, could have saved me a lot of anguish and wasted time.  But life, as Kierkegaard pointed out, can only be understood backwards, and it would be many years before the lesson the experience had to teach me would finally become clear.

(All my former students should stop reading now.) 

The summer after I graduated from college I was with a group of friends, and we had all eaten psilocybin mushrooms.  For some time, I didn’t understand what the fuss was all about; I didn’t seem to be what I thought of as “tripping” at all. “I just feel stoned,” I said to a friend.  “That’s it,” she replied:  “Just relax into it.”

And she was right:  as soon as let go of my prefabricated mental construct of “tripping” and simply allowed my experience to be what it was, I discovered that I was indeed tripping, and in a big way.  It was all happening already, but my willing-it-to-be had kept it from my awareness. Sober, I had the life I wanted already, and I didn’t know it, because I never “relaxed into it.”  The Zen teacher Sunryu Suzuki made a very similar point about the pursuit of satori, or sudden awakening, in meditation:

(A)s long as you think, “I am doing this,” or “I have to do this,” or “I must attain something special,” you are actually not doing anything.  When you give up, when you no longer want something, or when you do not try to do anything special, then you do something. When there is no gaining idea in what you do, then you do something.[vi]

Relax into it.

(Now, let me be clear:  I am not recommending mind-altering drugs.  There are far too many uncontrolled variables, too many dangers.  And the mind, moreover, is like a computer:  garbage in, garbage out.  The second time I used mushrooms, I was in a worse state of mind than I realized, and the drug released an amazing trove of mental garbage; the experience was so terrifying that I vowed never to do it again, a vow I have kept for twenty-four years. Finally, drugs and the like only seem to be expanding our minds while we are under their influence; they make no real and lasting change in us.  Eckhart Tolle posited that, while things like meditation can take us above our thoughts, things like drugs and television take us below them; both can free us from our thoughts, but not in equally beneficial ways.[vii])

Sri Ramakrishna, the 19th century Bengali saint who is regarded by many Hindus as an Incarnation of God, used a telling metaphor about wisdom seekers “doing something” in their quest for God. They climb the stairs of renunciation one by one, Ramakrishna said, and when they finally reach the roof, they discover that it is made of the same brick and lime as the stairs.[viii] We are not going anywhere, because we are already there—or at very least, “there” is not essentially different from “here,” now matter how much we sacrifice to our belief that is surely must be.


I’m tired of wandering; if the “one indivisible Self” resides in us all, where is there to go?  The Infinite does not “go” anywhere.  It is—you are--already there.

Jesus was apparently trying to get his hearers to “relax into it” when He told them, “The kingdom of God does not come with your careful observation, nor will people say, 'Here it is,' or 'There it is,' because the kingdom of God is within you."x  There is no place to go;  it is already here--you are already there. 

This is how the world regains its fascination: by our looking at it neither through the eyes of deluded desire that compare it to something “better” in our heads, nor through the eyes of calculation and greed for gain, but through the eyes of the Kingdom within, the eyes of a little child who sees “the dearest freshness deep down things.”  Not of drugged sleep, but of alert wakefulness.

“Could you not stay awake with me for one hour?” Jesus asked His disciples on the last night of His earthly life.[xi]  I think He asks each of us the same thing—“Keep awake, for you know neither the day nor the hour.”[xii]  When Jesus asks us to keep awake with Him, he is inviting us to share in His divine life and ministry.  According to poet Andrew Hudgins, Jesus is

…someone walking through his life—or hers—
Until God whispers, It’s you. And God’s ignored…
Or does God simply choose us all?[xiii]

So OK, smartass, I tell myself:  if you’re Jesus—if you abide in Him and He in you like vine and branch[xiv]--stay awake with yourself! Don’t be continually falling back into the sleep of life inside your head, don’t be always drawing a veil of expectations and desires between yourself and the circumstances in which God and your karma have placed you.  Don’t end up like Jacob, who had to physically wrestle with his Creator and sustain a painful injury before he could say,  “Surely the Lord is in this place, and I did not know it.”[xv]

Vedantic philosophy uses the image of coiled rope in a dimly-lit room to explain our cognitive dysfunction. If upon entering the room we mistake the rope for a snake, we will be unable to see the rope, and we cannot see the rope until we stop seeing the snake.  As long as we see our lives as preparatory, stalled, unreal or unfulfilling, we cannot see them as numinous, fascinating, “charged with the grandeur of God.”[xvi] These, says Paul Simon’s song, are the days of miracle and wonder—but all days are the days of miracle and wonder if we are fully present to them.  The earliest Christian texts speak, not of the “return” of the Christ, but of Christ’s “revelation;” when the scales fall from our eyes, we will see that we are already in God.  This is surely what the Psalmist longed for when he prayed,

When I awake, I will be fully satisfied, for I will see you face to face.[xvii]



[i] Tolle, Eckhart.  A New Earth:  Awakening to Your life’s Purpose.  Plume, 2006.  (202)
[ii] Hopkins, Gerard Manley.  “God’s Grandeur”
[iii] Vivekananda, Jnana Yoga.  Ramakrishna-Vivekananda Center, 1982.  (28)
[iv] Matthew 18:3
[v] http://drug-abuse.suite101.com/article.cfm/what-does-marijuana-actually-do
[vi] Suzuki, Shunryu. Zen Mind, Beginner’s Mind. Shambhala; 2006. (page 44)
[vii] Tolle, Eckhart:  A New Earth:  Awakening to Your life’s Purpose.  Plume, 2006.  (229)
[viii] The Gospel of Sri Ramakrishna, Abridged edition.  Translated by Swami Nikhilananda.  Ramakrishna-Vivekananda Center, 1988.  (271)
[ix] Katha Upanishad  II.i.9
[x] Luke 17: 20b-21
[xi] Matthew 26:40
[xii] Matthew 25:13
[xiii] Hudgins, Andrew. “Crucifixion—Montgomery, Alabama.” Upholding Mystery: An Anthology of Contemporary Christian Poetry.  David Impastato, Editor.  Oxford University Press, 1996. (8)
[xiv] cf. John 15:15
[xv] Genesis 28:16b, ESV
[xvi] Hopkins, Gerard Manley.  “God’s Grandeur”
[xvii] Psalm 17:15b, NLT

Thursday, April 8, 2010

Easter

Jesus said, "Very truly, I tell you, unless a grain of wheat falls into the earth and dies, it remains just a single grain; but if it dies, it bears much fruit”…Clinging to life causes life to decay; the life that is freely given is eternal.  –Principles of the Third Order of St. Francis
Before we left on our honeymoon in Greece, a friend who is a classics scholar gave us this heads-up:  The gods of Olympus are very much alive.  I little understood what he meant until we were ensconced in the highlands of Epirus, near the Albanian border.  We were staying in a little village called Tsepelovo, where the owner of the guest house introduced us to an English expatriate couple who had just opened a tourist lodge in nearby Kikouli. The couple took us under their wing and showed us around their village one evening—separately, to avoid scandalizing any of the kerchiefed matrons with the company of an unknown man.  
As I relaxed in the home of Petros, the village postman, in a living room with Ottoman-style divans, or raised cushioned platforms, lining all the walls in place of furniture, my host reclining on an elbow while his wife brought me a tasty dish of broad beans and spinach, I realized what my friend had meant:  Zeus Xenios, the God of Travelers, still animated these people who had been among the first to embrace the Gospel some two thousand years ago.  The “guest-friendship” of Homeric epic is still, for them, one of “the deep themes that tell the myths we live.”[i]  (I found the same spirit in Turkey; buyunuz, or “help yourself,” was one of the first words I learned there.)  The myths of Zeus and of Hestia, Goddess of the Hearth, are still a motive force in people’s daily lives.

What is the source of a myth’s power?  Not its historicity, certainly; some myths are based in historical events, while others are pure invention.  Nor is it the aesthetic power of the narrative itself; many myths are downright bizarre—even grotesque and disturbing--and while there are legions of beautiful stories, very few of them aspire to the mythic.

I think the power of a myth lies in the contact it makes with our selves, psychologically and spiritually. Myths are universal and eternal, but also deeply personal and subjective—and that subjectivity, the fact that one can actually experience the dynamics of myth in one’s own life, is what makes myths true and powerful. If you have not lived through something, the poet Kabir tells us, it is not true.[ii] Myths become true to the extent that they become true for us.

Anyone who’s ever tried to run a household—especially one that included kids—knows what it is to live the myth of Sisyphus, the king of Thessaly who was condemned for eternity to roll a boulder up a hill only to watch it roll down again every time.  The floor is no sooner mopped than it is dirty again, and dinner is never made, once and for all; which of us has never had an inkling of how Sisyphus must feel?

And Tantalus! Every time a piece of my music is short-listed without being chosen for performance, I remember you; every time I think I’ve got the drop on life in the morning only to be discouraged again by dinner time, I feel your pain.  Patron and spirit-familiar of everyone who’s ever had the prospect of advancement, promotion or success dangled “tantalizingly” before them only to have it snatched away over and over again--all of us who wanted to marry but never did, who tried and tried at life but never succeeded, who went again and again to call-backs and second interviews without being cast or hired, all the Willy Lomans and Eleanor Rigbys and Broadway Danny Roses who snatched defeat from the jaws of victory—all of us stand with you in Tartarus, up to our necks in water that recedes when we bend to drink, while the tempting fruit that hangs over our heads withdraws beyond our grasp when we reach out for it.  Your anguish lives in all of us.

A true hero, wrote Garrison Keillor, has the power to give us the gift of a larger life.   And while Sisyphus and Tantalus may be more anti-heroes than heroes, when we allow their myths to be present in our daily struggles and sufferings, those struggles and sufferings become ennobled, “connected to the stars, a part of the mind of God.”[iii]  Our little daily deaths become the stuff of new and larger life.

This is why I like the way Buddhist teacher Pema Chödrön describes the difficulties of life as “juicy.”  It reminds me of my undergraduate organ teacher’s explanation of why to hold on to a discord a little longer than its strict rhythmic value indicates:  “You want to squeeze a dissonance,” he told me, “because that’s where the juice is.”  Instead of fleeing from difficulty and discomfort, we can lean into them, squeeze them, because the really nourishing stuff is not to be found in what goes smoothly, but in what grates.

The trouble is that while our lives are plenty grating and painful and juicy, our myths have lost all their nubbliness through un- or over-familiarity, so that we fail to see the stories we are living.  Like most of scripture, the very roughness that made the old stories stick has been smoothed away to the point where they now seem simply outlandish tales—like the Greek myths—or the rarefied stuff of stained-glass windows, whose hagiographies and Bible stories seem to have no relevance to our actual experience.  “The old words of grace,” wrote novelist Walker Percy, “are worn smooth as poker chips and a certain devaluation has occurred, like a poker chip after it has been cashed in.”[iv]  Our myths are all around us, and we never claim them for our own because we do not recognize them and they have lost their sticking power for us.

Of course, sometimes myths do stick--and burn, like slow napalm.  I have long been sympathetic to Cain, for instance, in the Genesis myth. Cain worked hard and gave his best, but God rejected Cain’s offering of produce while accepting Abel’s animal sacrifice.  How is that fair? Why did God accept Abel’s offering of a dead animal and reject Cain’s offering of first fruits? Some scholars believe the prototype of this story goes back to a time of conflict between ancient Sumerian pastoralists and agriculturalists.  So is everyone meant to be a herdsman, and no one a farmer? Commentaries on Genesis 4 do a lot of speculating about Cain, supposing that his heart was not in the right place when he made his offering—or they drag in Hebrews and 1 Peter and say that without blood there is no forgiveness of sin.  But both of these interpretations are examples of eisegesis—reading ideas into the text rather than out of it.  The fact is that the chapters preceding Cain and Abel’s offerings don’t say anything at all about blood sacrifice or Cain’s state of mind.  All it says in the text is that God “had regard” for Abel’s offering, and for Cain’s offering God had “no regard.”  Most of us know what came next:  Cain killed Abel in a jealous rage.

Every time I see some people succeed because they know how to work the system, while others—no less able or hardworking—fail because they don’t know how to ingratiate themselves with the powerful, I think of Cain and Abel.  “The children of this world,” Jesus said, “are more shrewd in dealing with the world around them than are the children of the light.”[v]And while Cain may or may not have been more enlightened than Abel, maybe he killed Abel less because he was evil than because he’d been rooked.

Jesus also told a story about a brother who got the shaft.  One of the Jesuits at the college I went to told me that he hated the parable of the Prodigal Son (Luke 15:11-31.)  He said he always felt sorry for the dutiful older brother, who stayed home, worked hard and behaved responsibly—and never squandered the family fortune on prostitutes as his younger brother did .
Look! All these years I've been slaving for you and never disobeyed your orders. Yet you never gave me even a young goat so I could celebrate with my friends. But when this son of yours who has squandered your property with prostitutes comes home, you kill the fattened calf for him![vi]
Traditionally pious interpretation of this story says that we are all in the position of the irresponsible younger brother relative to God, and that to identify with the dependable elder brother is a sign of self-righteousness—but I don’t think one needs to be particularly sanctimonious to think that the elder brother got the short end of the stick.

Everyone lives a theology, one of my students once said, whether they articulate one or not.  The life we live proclaims the God in whom we believe, so it is good to pay attention to what we say with our lives.  Likewise, we can gain a lot by becoming aware of the myths we live. 

Sometimes myths work covertly beneath the surface, like the Oedipus and Elektra myths during our sexual maturation (if we are to believe Freud and Jung.)  But if we become aware of them, and of how they intersect with our own reality, we can open ourselves up to them so that they become a source of power, entering into our quotidian lives and lighting them up from the inside, like a candle in a Chinese lantern.  They can make us see the resonance and gravitas of our lives as lived.

The Easter myth should do that for me; the death and resurrection of Jesus is, after all, the main event of the Christian faith.  It’s really what we hang our hats on.  “If Christ has not been raised,” Paul told the church at Corinth, “your faith is futile.”[vii]

Many of my happiest childhood memories are of Easter—the music, the flowers, the return of spring after the long Upstate New York winter, the general good mood of everyone around me and the wonderful story at the center of everything. When I was a kid, the giddy triumphalism of Easter was enough—and Easter still “works” on me:  still fills me with profound gratitude and a warm sense of well-being.  But as I grow older, I find that that is no longer enough.  I want to live Easter—want it to light me up from inside.  If you have not lived through something, it is not true.

“No one takes (my life) from me,” Jesus told his disciples, “but I lay it down of my own accord. I have authority to lay it down and authority to take it up again.”[viii] But do I have a life worth laying down?  Is there any meaning in sacrificing what I never really made anything of by worldly standards? 

I built a life for myself—the life of a composer-academic.  I can’t say from this distance why I built that Frankenstein’s monster of a life, but I did, and it took an enormous outlay of time, effort and cash to do it.  Maybe that would be a worthy sacrifice.  But that life never amounted to much, as it turned out, and it didn’t really seem to be going anywhere when I walked away from it almost a year ago.  There’s a Hindu story about a farmer pouring threshed grain out of a tower so the wind could carry away the chaff; when the wind unexpectedly picked up and began blowing away the grain, too, he decided to give the grain to God, since it wasn’t going to do him any good anyway.  Obviously, there is no merit in a “sacrifice” like that.

Besides, something in me still clings to that life.  Though I have turned my back on it, I have never really let it die.  Sometimes I miss teaching fiercely; I still hear things on NPR and think, “I should download a podcast of that for class”—still read things in the paper and mark how useful they would be as teaching aids.  I still fantasize about the university seeing the error of its ways and calling to ask me to accept a fulltime job, with time already served counting toward tenure.  Even though part of me believes that “clinging to life causes life to decay,” while “the life that is freely given is eternal”--even though I dearly want to lay down that life and be raised to a new one--I have not yet pulled the plug on my do-it-yourself life. 

But then, can any of us really give anything to God? Is anything really ours to give? “Everything comes from you,” King David prayed, “and we have given you only what comes from your hand.”[ix]   True, we may have worked for what we have, but even the ability to work is a gift.  “To work you have the right,” Krishna told Arjuna, “but not to the fruits thereof.”[x] How can we offer what is not ours to give?

Those of us who have a Eucharistic understanding of Holy Communion—who believe that Jesus is present in the gifts offered on the altar—actually have this modeled for us week after week:  the best thing we can give to God is God.  That’s what we offer in the Mass:  God in the bread and wine, and “ourselves, our souls and bodies, to be a reasonable, holy and living sacrifice.”[xi]  God gives God, Whom we offer back to God wrapped in ourselves.  “God is the offering, the one who offers, and the fire that consumes.”[xii] 


God didn’t raise Jesus the Rabbi from the dead, or Jesus the carpenter’s son from Nazareth, or Jesus who liked to eat and drink[i]—those are all too small, too partial, too incidental.  God raised Jesus the Son of God—the Essential Being, the Absolute Core Identity, the unchanging, eternal, inmost Self.  The other, contingent stuff, what we usually identify as our “selves,” died and was left behind, like the shroud in the tomb—or at least, it took on a less rigid, less definitive, less substantial nature.  Consider:  in two of the best-known post-Resurrection stories—Jesus feeding his fisherman disciples breakfast by the Lake of Tiberias (John 21:1-14) and Jesus meeting another group of disciples on the road to Emmaus (Luke 24:13-35)—the disciples, significantly, do not recognize their Lord at first sight.  By the lake, the account says the disciples didn’t dare ask Him who He was because they “knew” it was Jesus—a strange thing to say if they simply recognized Him by sight.  On the Emmaus road, the travelers’ “hearts were burning” while he explained to them that the Christ had to suffer before entering into His glory, but they didn’t definitively recognize Him until He asked the blessing and broke the bread at table.  So they didn’t know Him by His appearance, or his gait, or his hillbilly accent;  apparently, he didn’t even have those things any more—or if He did, He held them lightly enough that they didn’t give Him away. 


It seems, then, that the things Jesus did after He rose—bringing about a miraculous catch of fish, feeding people, teaching, charging them with each other’s care (“Simon, son of John…feed my lambs”) are of the undying, central Self, and they enabled the disciples to recognize in Him the Anointed One.  They knew Him when God shone in Him.  But whatever made Jesus immediately recognizable as a Galilean, an itinerant teacher, a person answering to a particular description, had fallen away, or become muted, effaced, attenuated to the point where they no longer took center stage.

There is a Zen Buddhist exercise in which one asks, “Who am I?”, and then replies, to each answer that presents itself, “That is not who I am.” All those answers have to do with what are called nama and rupa in Sanskrit:  "name" and "form," not essential reality. The Risen Christ has no political affiliation, religious denomination, race, ethnicity, country of origin, native language, titles or degrees—none of the things which we regard as the fixed and solid constituents of our identities.  If we would die and rise with Christ, we must hold lightly to those things, too.

I believe that we have so much conflict in this country now because so many of us cling mightily to the stories we tell ourselves about ourselves:  I am, I’m from, I know, I believe, I will, I won’t.  If we could loosen our hold on these things, we would hear and understand each other better; we could see more possibilities, and we would have more peace.

Maybe the paste-up life I made for myself-- father, husband, performer, musician, writer, teacher—is what I need to be prepared to let go of, so that the essential kernel of me can bear fruit.  Maybe we all need to be prepared to give up everything that we think makes us identifiable—all those passing-away autobiographical things we have so laboriously put on like stage costumes.  If that’s what needs to die in order for the radiant new creation to be born—if that’s what it will take for the Easter myth to shine in me from within—then God help me to give it.  Let me lay it all down, trusting in the gift of a larger life, so that if any come seeking the old, false me in days to come, Easter may shine through me, saying, Why do you look for the living among the dead?  He is not here; he is risen![ii]





[i] See Matthew 11:19
[ii] Luke 24:5-6
[i] Moore, Thomas, Care of the Soul.  Harper Perennial, 1994.  (page 11)
[ii] “How Much is Not True,” by Kabir.  Translated by Robert Bly. The Rag and Bone Shop of the Heart:  A Poetry Anthology.  Harper Perennial, 1993.  (page 282)
[iii] Keillor, Garrison, “The Babe,” in Stories:  An Audio Collection. Highbridge Audio (1993)
[iv] Percy, Walker.  The Message in the Bottle
[v] Luke 16: 8b (New Living Translation)
[vi] Luke 15: 29-30
[vii] 1 Corinthians 15:17
[viii] John 10:18
[ix] 1 Chronicles 29: 14b
[x] Bhagavad Gita 2:47, as translated by Sri Ramakrishna according to Swami Vivekananda
[xi] Book of Common Prayer
[xii] Bhagavad Gita 4:24a; translation http://www.indiadivine.org/audarya/shakti-sadhana/179470-divine-mother-shiva-pujas-om.html
[xiii] See Matthew 11:19
[xiv] Luke 24:5-6

Friday, March 12, 2010

The Squirrels Have the Conn

It is funny how mortals always picture us as putting things into their minds: in reality our best work is done by keeping things out.  –C.S. Lewis, The Screwtape Letters

It was happening again.  After several weeks of living in a sort of energized serenity, enthusiastic about my goals and confident in my ability to move toward them, I felt as though my brain’s remote control had been hijacked by hyperactive squirrels. I found it immensely hard to concentrate on anything, and couldn’t seem to find the time for any of the things I was supposed to be doing. The squirrels kept changing the channel in my head.

I used to think these occasional hijackings were a simple periodical phenomenon, like biorhythms, but I have come to believe they have a definable cause.  It’s like this: A few years ago Jerry Falwell and Barry Lynn, the director of Americans United for the Separation of Church and State appeared together on CNBC’s Capital Report.[i] For several months, Falwell had been attempting to embolden conservative churches into endorsing candidates by persuading them that the IRS had no power to enforce tax law.  As evidence, he asserted that his Old Time Gospel Hour ministry had never had its tax-exempt status revoked despite plenty of overtly partisan politicking.  When Lynn attempted to expose this canard, Falwell called him a liar. 

After the CNBC debate, Lynn obtained a copy of the 1993 IRS document comprising Falwell’s agreement to pay $50,000 in back taxes.  It seems the IRS had retroactively revoked Old Time Gospel Hour’s tax-exempt status for 1986-87, when Falwell was using the program to endorse candidates.  The document bore Falwell’s signature.

About a month later, Lynn and Falwell were again debating, this time on the Fox News Channel.  When Falwell again denied having ever been penalized for improper political activity, Lynn produced the IRS document.  As soon as he realized what Lynn was about to show for the cameras, Falwell went berserk, shouting at Lynn and the host and attempting to prevent the paper’s being filmed.

This is what happens inside my head.  As soon as I get too close to seeing something in there that my inner Jerry Falwell doesn’t want me to see, he cries havoc and lets slip the squirrels of war.  And gives them coffee.  And they start changing the channel every few seconds, drawing my attention toward memories, anticipations, fantasies and daydreams, “conversations with people who aren’t there”[ii]—anything, in fact, but the man behind the curtain, that thing they are charged with keeping out of my awareness.

Maybe it is actually the Devil in my head, masquerading as Jerry Falwell.  As a matter of fact, I am coming to believe that if “the evil powers of this world which corrupt and destroy the creatures of God”[iii] have an objective existence, it is as a sort of psychic parasite on our own minds, exploiting our self-deceptive tendencies from within.  Marianne Williamson said that one of her friends had tried to persuade her that the Devil was all in her head.  “That is the worst place he could possibly be!” she rejoined.  “That is not good news!  If he were either stalking the earth somewhere…or between your ears, where would you rather he be?”


So how do we disempower the Devil and his army of squirrels in our heads?  If the way to defeat a blackmailer is to come clean about whatever he is threatening to expose, and if these squirrels are working in collaboration with my own self-deceptive desires, maybe the approach should be the same:  come right out and confront the things that the squirrels and I are hiding from me.  I think I know what some of them are:


·     I never advanced beyond a middling point in academia because I am a mediocre academic. “Our duties are determined by our deserts to a much larger extent than we are willing to grant."[iv] Maybe I wasn’t robbed; maybe I actually got what I was fit for.
·     If I had applied myself more in school, I would have a fulfilling career now. Plenty of people who worked harder, not smarter during our school days are now in a position to hire me.
·     I can’t get my classical music performed because it’s just not as good as I think it is.  As cartoonist Adam Green put it, “Is there anything more knee-slappingly hilarious than the delusion of one who believes they will be paid for their meager so-called talent?”[v]
·     Even if anything should work out for me now, I’m too old at this point to make something of myself anyway.

I made this list, and it rings true as far as it goes; before my latest attack of squirrelophrenia, I had caught a glimpse of these conclusions, and the sudden violence of the attack seems to indicate that it was meant to keep me from going any further down that road.  After all, if I “give up all hope of fruition,” as the Buddhists say, the Squirrelmaster loses one of his most powerful means of keeping me miserable.

And yet, something seems missing; the list feels incomplete.  I can’t shake the feeling that there is something larger, some overarching truth that embraces all of these and better explains the Herculean labors of the squirrels to distract me. Moreover, although I suspect that the above statements are to a greater or lesser extent true, I can still posit mitigations to all of them—they are all relative, and therefore still open to amendment and clarification.  There must be some absolutely simple, clear and incontrovertible truth whose power for change is great enough to move the Devil to arm his collaborators in my head in order to keep it out of the light.

As it happens, recent events brought this latest attack to an abrupt end.  I had scheduled a root canal for the morning, after which my family had planned to drive down to D.C. to visit my wife’s mother and stepfather, who is in the last stages of cancer and is not expected to live more than one to three months. As I drove around looking for a parking space, I saw the flashing lights of a police cruiser in my rearview mirror and pulled over.  As I sat in the car waiting for what seemed like a long time, a second police car pulled up.  Trying to look nonchalant, I pulled out my license and registration, and discovered that the latter had expired.  And things were destined to get worse, as I could tell by the flashing lights and radio sounds all around me. 

I should explain that I ordinarily drive our Toyota Rav 4—the “kid car,” as my children call it—since I do the lion’s share of the family driving.  On this particular morning I was driving our Saturn wagon, which generally sits by the curb waiting for my wife to take it, rather than the train, to work.  So because I hardly ever drive this car, its paperwork had developed what Douglas Adams called a “Somebody Else’s Problem Field” (S.E.P. field for short) around it. 

So I am pulled over one block away from my endodontist’s office, twenty minutes before my scheduled root canal, and I have no idea how long this is all going to take.  When I learn from the officer—who had somehow seen from his car as mine went by that my inspection was past due, which was what precipitated the whole thing—that my registration, inspection and emissions were all expired, I decide to call my wife to let her know what’s going on and ask her to call the endodontist.  Unable to get my phone out while sitting down, I stand up next to my car and dial the phone.  The cop starts screaming something about getting back in the car unless I wanted a pair of handcuffs.  (Why do they act like that?)  I got back in and, when he inexplicably stalks over anyway to yell at me to get in, I ask if I should call off my appointment.  All he will do in response is yell “Get in the car” again. Understand that I am in the car at the time.  (Why do they act like that?)  Hands shaking, I call my wife and tell her what’s going on.  She does her best to calm me down, and says she will let the endodontist know I will be late.

Ultimately, they tow my car away.  Fifteen minutes later, I am sitting in the chair with a anesthetic swab between my cheek and gum and my car on its way to the police impound lot, about to have a root canal before my wife picks me up to go visit my dying stepfather-in-law.

We finally got to DC and saw him. My mother-in-law showed us pictures of him from earlier in the week, sitting up in bed alertly talking with an old friend who had come in to town to see him.  It was hard to connect the person in those pictures to the sallow, semiconscious figure on the hospital bed in the living room.  It’s astonishing how steeply and abruptly a person with cancer can decline. It makes one acutely aware of one’s mortality.

As I prepared for bed with the Compline, or Night Prayer, service from the Book of Common Prayer, I actually felt more thankful than anything else, strangely enough.  I had been in the present all day, and notwithstanding the state of the present--which teetered between the somber and the surreal--it was a good day.  Far better than the squirrels would have arranged.  Once outside my own head, I was beyond their reach.

Which didn't stop strange things from happening inside my head. Some weeks later I had what now appears to have been a migraine aura—a strange visual disturbance that made it seem as though someone had smeared living, squirming Vaseline all around the periphery of my visual field, while shimmering zig-zag lines occasionally floated into view.  I also felt a little dizzy and shaky. And while none of these symptoms may seem particularly alarming, I had never had a migraine before (that I knew of) and didn’t know what an aura looked like—neither did I know that they are more common in men than in women, or that they tend to occur “later in life.” 

Now, in spite of carrying some extra weight, I am in pretty good health; my blood pressure was 116/63 last time I had it checked, and my resting pulse 64. But when a doctor who happened to be nearby began asking me questions about funny smells or tastes, numbness and tingling—questions that made it clear that he suspected a stroke—I began to panic a little. So many of my aunts and uncles succumbed in their fifties to heart attacks while I was growing up—one of my cousins was thirty years old when she died—that an infarct is more or less my go-to fear.  (That, and the cancer that killed my mother.)   Frightened that I was having a stroke, I became so pale and alarming that my friends called my wife to leave work and take me home.  (It must sound by this point that I spend most of my time being picked up by my wife.  I don’t.)

Of course, I felt ridiculous on the surface—I was, after all, just fine—but deeper down I knew I had something very important to learn from the incident:  I am not reconciled to the inevitability of old age, sickness and death. 

I think this must be the real truth that the squirrels have been charged with hiding.  Don’t let him think about it, they’ve been told. You know what Samuel Johnson said:  When a man knows he is to be hanged in a fortnight, it concentrates his mind wonderfully. If we allow this guy to come to terms with his mortality, he will be unstoppable.  Where’s that remote?

I heard Bhagavan Das tell a story about a sea turtle in the depths of the ocean who comes up and, as if by chance, puts its head through a small wooden ring floating on the surface.  The probability of this happening, he said, is the same as the probability of a human birth.  So a human birth is an immeasurably precious thing, and there are both a staggering opportunity and an immense responsibility bound up with this earthly life.  Consider the familiar Parable of the Talents:
(The Kingdom of Heaven) will be like a man going on a journey, who called his servants and entrusted his property to them. To one he gave five talents of money, to another two talents, and to another one talent, each according to his ability. Then he went on his journey. The man who had received the five talents went at once and put his money to work and gained five more. So also, the one with the two talents gained two more. But the man who had received the one talent went off, dug a hole in the ground and hid his master's money.
        After a long time the master of those servants returned and settled accounts with them. The man who had received the five talents brought the other five. 'Master,' he said, 'you entrusted me with five talents. See, I have gained five more.' His master replied, 'Well done, good and faithful servant! You have been faithful with a few things; I will put you in charge of many things. Come and share your master's happiness!'
        The man with the two talents also came. 'Master,' he said, 'you entrusted me with two talents; see, I have gained two more.'  His master replied, 'Well done, good and faithful servant! You have been faithful with a few things; I will put you in charge of many things. Come and share your master's happiness!'
        Then the man who had received the one talent came. 'Master,' he said, ‘… I was afraid and went out and hid your talent in the ground. See, here is what belongs to you.'
        His master replied, 'You wicked, lazy servant!...
Take the talent from him and give it to the one who has the ten talents. For everyone who has will be given more, and he will have an abundance. Whoever does not have, even what he has will be taken from him.'[vi]

The servants, of course, represent all of us—this is the situation in which we all find ourselves.  When we come to give an account of our lives, what return will we be able to make on the talents with which we have been invested? 

I took my children to a maple sugaring festival along with a friend of theirs from school.  Run by the city, the festival is an impoverished affair without any music, so as I often do I brought along my concertina.  As I sat on a bench and played some old American tunes, a few curious children and their parents stopped to listen.  Off to one side, I heard a mom drawing her little girl’s attention to what I was doing.  “Look at that, honey—do you know what that is?” she asked.  “An old man?” the little girl replied.

(Breathe…breathe…)

Now, any normal forty-five-year-old person might think this funny, in a cute, Art Linkletter sort of way.  But it bothered me. A lot. And it still does.  I’d like to say that I couldn’t tell you why, but it wouldn’t be true.  When I heard the words “old man,” the old man that came to mind was the one Walt Whitman wrote of, “who has lived without purpose, and feels it with bitterness worse than gall.” 

Thank you in advance, but don’t bother telling me this isn’t true, because I know it isn’t.  I have two fantastic children and a wonderful wife who puts up with my mishegoss; I am still making music and doing my best to alleviate the suffering of my fellow creatures. But in spite of everything I have always thought I believed, I still struggle to find peace with the fact that I am probably more than halfway through my life without anything to show that I am, in any worldly sense, a “success.”  I haven’t set the world on fire! I haven’t “made a difference!”  If I were George Bailey, I’d have gone to jail!

Insufferable, I know.  And yes, I am mentally ill.  But I don’t believe I am alone in this.  Isn’t our whole culture frantic to keep us distracted?   There are now video screens at the gas pump. We can watch movies on our phones.  A former vice-presidential candidate is apparently pitching a reality show.  Shopping malls surpassed historical sites as tourist destinations years ago.  The interactive TV walls Ray Bradbury envisioned in Fahrenheit 451 have become a reality (as have many other things in that remarkably prescient book.)  News has degenerated into entertainment, while entertainment has been elevated to news. 

Of course, the circus master Sleary in Dickens’s Hard Times was right:  people must be amused; they can’t always working, nor always learning. But we as a society are, as sociologist Neil Postman put it, “amusing ourselves to death.”  What are we as a people trying so desperately not to face?

Yes, we don’t want to think about death.  And there are a lot of frightening things afoot these days that are hard to confront, from climate change to resistant disease germs to transforming demographics.  Our children will inherit an unstable world from us after we die, which will not be very long from now. 

But I think there is more to it than that. I believe that not only do we not want to think about death—we don’t want to think about life, either.  We have a high calling, we humans.  When my children try to sneak away from the table without drinking their milk, I remind them that a farmer and a cow worked hard to make that milk, and it won’t do to waste it.  Well, the universe has labored to make us, and yet we let ourselves go to waste.  Though we don’t like to think about it, “we know that the whole creation has been groaning as in the pains of childbirth right up to the present time."[vii]  And in order not to face the charge we have to keep, we allow the squirrels to direct our attention here, there, everywhere but the present moment—which is, as they know, precisely where the treasure is. Now is the day of salvation.[viii]

In the midst of life, we are in death, the Book of Common Prayer tells us.  Our lives are precious, and they are finite.  Work while you have the light.

So I’m going to stay aware of the squirrels; they can change the channel, but they cannot make me watch.  They cannot hide themselves along with the things they’re trying to keep me from seeing.  Even in the midst of distraction, I’m going to keep doing my best to redirect my attention to the present moment and the revelations it contains. Life, as poet R. S. Thomas put it,

…is not hurrying

on to a receding future, nor hankering after
an imagined past. It is the turning
aside like Moses to the miracle
of the lit bush, to a brightness
that seemed as transitory as your youth
once, but is the eternity that awaits you.

The squirrels got nothing on that.



[i] http://www.thefreelibrary.com/At+the+Falwell+follies:+Jerry+finally+'fesses+up+on+Fox+News+Channel.-a0122553390
[ii] A nod to Anne LaMott’s Bird by Bird
[iii] Baptismal vows, Book of Common Prayer
[iv] Vivekananda, Karma Yoga and Bhakti Yoga.  Ramakrishna-Vivekananda Center, 1982.
[v] http://www.adamgreenonline.com/newsletters_2006/trib050995.html
[vi] Matthew 25: 14-29, edited for length
[vii] Romans 8:22